now i`m not sure if it is stolen

maybe its coincedence.
lets hope ey?

I'm increasingly thinking this is the key-you attended the shows and thus saw the performance and the music was thus more 'alive' for you and more attainable. It's like watching ballet on TV, which is dull, dul, dull but live it can be breath-taking!EyE wrote:The music on this album has been a treasure for me eversince I heard it at the first AH show.
perhaps you should try listening to it again in the proper conditions steve had in mind while mixing it?Big Bad Bill wrote:It was conceived with the live audience in mind and the CD only provides one dimension of the experience.
April 9, 2007:
I changed the name of the record to "Sound Theories."
I just finished the stereo and 5.1 mixes of the record.
It’s stunning to hear this stuff in 5.1. I opted to place the rock band (bass drums, and myself) in the stereo portion of the mix for the most part, and delegate the orchestra to all of the 5.1 areas. Hearing this kind of a robust spread is a bird of a different color. It’s rich dense and magnificent to be embraced by the surround audio experience.
I mixed the surround sound with the specification that the listener should have in their set up 5 of the same exact speakers. These speakers would take the place of the two front stereo pair, the two rear surround pair and the middle center speaker.
All speakers should be set to the same output level. The sweet spot for the listener would be right in the middle of the configuration.
Most 5.1 mixes of live shows have the entire mix in the front stereo pair and the audience ambient tracks in the rear. This creates the awareness of being in the venue and hearing things from the perspective of being in the audience, but with my mix I decided to create a listening environment as if the listener was standing where the conductor is and is surrounded by the orchestra.
The only down side to this is that if you’re at home watching this DVD and listening to the 5.1 mix, your system would need to be set up as described above or it could end up sounding kind of odd. I’ll have to put a notice on the DVD that explains the set up and that I would recommend listening to the stereo DVD mix instead of the 5.1 mix if your set up is not balanced the way the mix intended it to be.
You see, I even want to control the way you set up your home listening environment. Good thing I’m to too much of a control freak or I would have to visit your house and set it up properly myself.
Thanks for hanging in there.
More to come.
![]()
The CD has a stereo mix. The DVD has a 5.1 (and the stereo mix of course). Steve`s suggestions are for 5.1 mix so they are of no use at the moment.another virtuoso wrote:perhaps you should try listening to it again in the proper conditions steve had in mind while mixing it?Big Bad Bill wrote:It was conceived with the live audience in mind and the CD only provides one dimension of the experience.
April 9, 2007:
I changed the name of the record to "Sound Theories."
I just finished the stereo and 5.1 mixes of the record.
It’s stunning to hear this stuff in 5.1. I opted to place the rock band (bass drums, and myself) in the stereo portion of the mix for the most part, and delegate the orchestra to all of the 5.1 areas. Hearing this kind of a robust spread is a bird of a different color. It’s rich dense and magnificent to be embraced by the surround audio experience.
I mixed the surround sound with the specification that the listener should have in their set up 5 of the same exact speakers. These speakers would take the place of the two front stereo pair, the two rear surround pair and the middle center speaker.
All speakers should be set to the same output level. The sweet spot for the listener would be right in the middle of the configuration.
Most 5.1 mixes of live shows have the entire mix in the front stereo pair and the audience ambient tracks in the rear. This creates the awareness of being in the venue and hearing things from the perspective of being in the audience, but with my mix I decided to create a listening environment as if the listener was standing where the conductor is and is surrounded by the orchestra.
The only down side to this is that if you’re at home watching this DVD and listening to the 5.1 mix, your system would need to be set up as described above or it could end up sounding kind of odd. I’ll have to put a notice on the DVD that explains the set up and that I would recommend listening to the stereo DVD mix instead of the 5.1 mix if your set up is not balanced the way the mix intended it to be.
You see, I even want to control the way you set up your home listening environment. Good thing I’m to too much of a control freak or I would have to visit your house and set it up properly myself.
Thanks for hanging in there.
More to come.
![]()
STEVE, the post cards you made for us depicting the daily miseries, quirks, and triumphs of the album as the concept was made reality were such an enjoyment to read. It was great to get these behind the scenes snapshots of all the work that went into the album. That's a perspective the fans rarely get to experience. I'm really hoping you'll continue with the post cards in the future! Thanks again
True! When I listen to the music on Sound Theories it brings me back to those AH shows and I realy enjoy listening to every song on the album.Big Bad Bill wrote:I'm increasingly thinking this is the key-you attended the shows and thus saw the performance and the music was thus more 'alive' for you and more attainable. It's like watching ballet on TV, which is dull, dul, dull but live it can be breath-taking!EyE wrote:The music on this album has been a treasure for me eversince I heard it at the first AH show.
I await the DVD with baited breath...........